Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaippavan Yaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jaippavan Yaar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is certainly not a notable film, and even its existence is unverifiable. I can find no mention of it anywhere not derived from this Wikipedia article. The article's only source is Facebook. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:49, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While verifiability may be hard to judge for us, there is indeed no evidence at all (and little probability) of any notability. Fram (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. No RS to prove notability. May even be a hoax.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any speedy deletion criterion that applies. ("Blatant hoax" is a valid criterion, but that is very different indeed from "May even be a hoax".) JamesBWatson (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as hoax, because it's obviously a hoax. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 21:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.