Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jai Maa Vaishanav Devi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Maa Vaishanav Devi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very short article with many issues. 333 -blue 03:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: if the title is correctly transcribed, I can find nothing that would make an article about the film meet WP:NFILM. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:37, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: zero coverage in reliable sources as far as I can see. --Rubbish computer 11:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ALTS: for Cinema of India > WP:INDAFD: see "Jai Maa Vaishanav Devi" and "Gulshan Kumar"

Keep and improve through the many sources which can be found through a truely diligent WP:BEFORE. (sigh) Come on Sam Sailor and Rubbish computer. Were youguys unaware that Google News does not crawl nor index Indian newspaper articles properly, and because of that weakness we use WP:INDAFD. Heck, look at these articles and reviews and try to claim that sources do not exist. Sheesh. And nominator, having "issues" is more a reason to address them than it is to delete. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment, MichaelQSchmidt, the first thing I learned here was to turn off Ghostery. I have used the info found at http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/moviemicro/cast/id/504031 to add an infobox to the article. The remaining seven results you mention as "these articles and reviews" are either empty (4) or mere listings (2). I'm open to the idea that sources may exist out there somewhere, but I can't find them, and this single IMDb'ish entry from Bollywoodhungama does not make the film meet WP:NFILM. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I now opt (sigh) for a temporary delete over a major confusion I have with the year of this film. Same title in different sources with same director and producer but with a different cast and crew. One has this film released in 1994 and another one has it released in 1995. All the original version offered was title and producer butno year. As the author stated he "Added Basic information. Will add the full story shortly.", I need to hold off until he returns to tell us just which year he was writing about, as that directly effects sourcing. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:27, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I'm not seeing much convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.