Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JahshakaVR:Jahshaka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per CSD A4: This is substantially the same article as the many previous versions which were deleted, the author deliberately recreated it despite the AfD results (see User talk:JahshakaVR#update) and there appears to be a conflict of interest between the author and the topic. As such, I don't think that we need a full AfD. I've salted this article name and Jahshaka to try to stop this spamming. Nick-D (talk) 22:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JahshakaVR:Jahshaka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article had previously been deleted via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahshaka. It has since been re-created and deleted as a repost, but the current version differs in content and unlike the previously discussed one cites a reliable third-party source, namely German magazine LinuxUser (it also cites OSNews, but I couldn't find any indication that source is subject to editorial oversight). This, and a couple of less detailed results found by Google News, puts Jahshaka from "clearly not notable" into "debatable" in my book, though personally I don't think it's enough. Huon (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.