Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jahia (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. The article has been deleted in 3 different AfDs, and the last one was less than 4 months ago. At that one, it was suggested that, due to persistent recreation, it be SALTed this time. If it's recreated again that's exactly what I'll do. Anyone who thinks the topic has suddenly become notable should take it to WP:DRL. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jahia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software product. After four previous AfDs, the last one five months ago, I cannot see that it has gained any notability lately. Haakon (talk) 19:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: more than 400 hits on Gnews for Jahia (yes, not all for this but lots of it), article on French wiki since May 2007; therefore this article needs more content and refs, but is notable in my eyes. Dewritech (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I have no idea where to add my comments, the deletion for review page is full with stuff about other software I have no Idea of, WIKIPEDIA FIX YOUR INTERFACE!!! However, Jahia is one of the leading CMS systems. That your own private blogs runs on 'wordpress' or 'drupal' or Joomla, and you know it, doesn't mean that CMS systems in the enterprise world shouldn't get noticed. Wikipedia turns more and more away from a democracy into a elete set of users that have 'Authority' and like there status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.9.171.121 (talk) 22:56, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]