Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdschloss Glienicke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RFerreira (talk) 19:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jagdschloss Glienicke[edit]
- Jagdschloss Glienicke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete no indication that his hunting lodge cum castle is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. There is a lengthy article on this castle at de.wikipedia [1]; perhaps someone could translate it? Kafka Liz (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The German wikipedia article claims this castle is an UNESCO World Heritage Site, and the Norwegian wikipedia also has an article on it. (I added this claim of notability and added the interwikis). – sgeureka t•c 20:53, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My translation skills aren't exactly good, but I tried my best. – sgeureka t•c 21:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, World Heritage standing confirmed. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 21:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as a UNESCO site, it seems to be plenty notable. matt91486 (talk) 23:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (suggest withdraw) after sgeureka's translation from the German article; I'll fix as necessary any remaining issues with the translation. Eusebeus (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Carlos, you ok if someone closes this now? Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. The Telegraph calls it "One of Germany's finest baroque buildings". —David Eppstein (talk) 06:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.