Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagdeep Baweja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jagdeep Baweja[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Baweja made his first-class debut in the 2015–16 Ranji Trophy, but hardly there is any significant coverage about him. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 19:07, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. –Cupper52^Discuss! 19:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers, per WP:ATD. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers 1 FC game, but I couldn't find any significant coverage, although there might be some stuff locally. Redirect is a good WP:ATD, but this one should probably have been BOLDly redirected. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to having enough sourcing to pass GNG. It is time we stopped being cricketpedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers per Lugnuts and RF22 Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Seems sensible here. StickyWicket (talk) 19:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.