Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagat Taran School Allahabad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jagat Taran School Allahabad[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article cites no sources or references to verify or sustain an article. Fails WP:GNG. I could find a web page for Jagat Taran Golden Jubilee School, Allahabad [1], Jagat Taran Girls Degree College, Allahabad [2] and Jagat Taran Upper Primary School [3] the only direct reference to a 'Jagat Taran School Allahabad ' is the Wikipedia article and there is no way to know which, if any, of these this article is meant to refer to because the article is completely un-sourced. Jbh ^Talk 12:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC) Statement amended Jbh ^Talk 21:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Comment according to this there's a Jagat Taran Education Society which, I presume, runs all three schools. The Girls Degree College is affiliated with Allahabad University. Kraxler (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, secondary schools are de facto notable, if their existence can be proved, independent of GNG. In this case it's exactly the problem: What can one make of "Jagat Taran School Allahabad"? It may mean any of three different schools or the education society. I think it's best to delete this and wait for somebody to write an article on any one of these schools, with sources. Kraxler (talk) 21:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or re-write and re-name to be about the school that succeeded this former school, Jagat Taran Golden Jubilee School (school history). No objection to delete because what is there is basically a pico-stub and there's nothing in the history that would be useful in a well-written article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 02:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.