Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagadananda Goswami (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:08, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jagadananda Goswami[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC as well as WP:ANYBIO due to lack of notable work. No assertion of notability. Can't find independent source supporting notability for this religious teacher. Being a disciple or a teacher of someone does not make a person notable. Venkat TL (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 11:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom Padavalam🌂 ► 11:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't qualify WP:GNG. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 00:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.