Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Stone
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:55, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Jacqueline Stone[edit]
- Jacqueline Stone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This woman is clearly successful, academically, in her marketing role and on stage. I wasn't convinced that it all adds up to WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully, we can now establish it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete my search came up inconclusive for notability. lot of the refs in the article come up 404 so it was difficult to find. Wikibios yes, wikipedia no.Bryce Carmony (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Does not meet the general notability guideline. --Inother (talk) 11:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete there is no substance to the many references, or to anything else I can find on her. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.