Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Moody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 08:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Moody[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources which are independent of the subject were found to indicate that she meets the notability criteria. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to WordWord. The subject "seems" to meet WP:BLP1E. There are a lot of Gbooks and GNews hits about some "Jacqueline Moody", but the majority of them seems to refer to other people the same name, and the sources that certainly are related to her are referred to WordWorld. Cavarrone (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy with that redirect, if that was to be the consensus here PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Take a look now. The profile has been expanded and I found a host of additional independent sources, including the new york post and The Hour. The subject meets the notability criteria under WP:CREATIVE and WP:ANYBIO due to her emmy award. Transatlanick (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2 daytime Emmy Award wins tick nicely at WP:ANYBIO and her writing and producing a notable show ticks nicely at WP:CREATIVE. While the article will benefit from expansion, the project will not be improved by deletion of a sourcably notable topic, and WP:BLP1E is for topics expected to otherwise remain or be likely to remain, a low-profile individual... and as co-creater of a notable series that has been airing and receiving coverage continuously since 2007, we do not exactly have a BLP1E event. Kudos to User:Transatlanick. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 15:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As an Emmy winner, the subject is notable. Vincelord (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.