Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline King

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No support for deletion, though it needs improvement so have added tag for BLP references. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline King[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article feels more like a resume and not a Wikipedia article, As I said with Mary Scheer’s article, if deletion is not an option, I want to see solid evidence this article meets WP:NACTOR or even possibly WP:BLOWITUP and start fresh from there. Pahiy (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:04, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is not in CV format. I have removed the tag. She has been a regular for 20-30 years on UK and is a recognisable tv character actor. scope_creep^Talk 08:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - while there is scope to improve the article her regular TV series appearances such as her semi-regular role in Doctor Who would seem to me to suggest she is notable enough to have an article. Dunarc (talk) 20:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The trend of the discussion is Keep, but some indication of sources to support notability would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 04:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'd say her regular appearances in 55 Degrees North, Doctors and Doctor Who are enough for her to pass #1 of WP:ENT. There is also this source from the Radio Times about her role in Theresa v Boris (not extensive but more than a passing mention). WJ94 (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article needs improvement, but the subject looks notbale. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 20:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.