Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Hayden

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jacqueline Hayden[edit]

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Lavalizard101 (talk) 19:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Jacqueline Hayden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence of notability, only sourced to primary sources, a search turned up nothing other than ppl with the same name, a7 speedy declined due to it being "an older article with limited resources on it", that's not really a reason to decline speedy as it doesn't actually address the criterion suggested. Lavalizard101 (talk) 16:55, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.