Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Deaner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss New Mexico USA. Redirect is always preferred over deletion and consensus is to redirect the non-notables so closing as such (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:05, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Deaner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deaner is not anywhere near notable. There is one source, so even if it was reliable, secondary and third party, it would not pass GNG which requires multiple. However the one source is her official "biogrpahy" for the Miss USA organization, a biography that exists for the purpose of promoting her. Miss New Mexico USA winners, like other such winners, will in general only get very limited press coverage in their home towns (not even state wide) at the time of their victory. There is just not the coverage of people winning these awards to justify having articles on them. They generally fade quickly into obscurity. They are basically one event people, and we have rules that in general discourage articles on people notable for only one event. John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My searches came up dry.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 20:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss New Mexico USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:05, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 22:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss New Mexico USA as valid search term and subject is best known for this. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.