Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Mellis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Pigman☿ 05:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Mellis[edit]

Fails WP:BIO#Athletes and WP:FOOTY/Notability as has never played in a fully pro league. Am also nominating

As they all fail for the same reason. None of them have a squad number, and none have played at international football at U-21 level. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 12:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 12:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All - reserve/youth team players = non notable. If/when they make a fully professional league appearance, then they will merit an article. - fchd (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all for failing to meet all appropriate criteria. Under 17 caps are not considered to confer notability ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:14, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, what ChrisTheDude says is true. Punkmorten (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Tejera. At least Tejera is meeting the general WP:N criteria (has received significant coverage in reliable sources). He has been named one of the 50 most exciting teenagers in the world game by World Soccer, one of the world's top football magazines, has played in the U-17 WC and '"sergio tejera" chelsea' get 4.820 hits on Google. Sebisthlm (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, if/when they play at professional level the articles can be recreated. King of the North East 15:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Mellis. Has been given a squad number (50) and added to Chelsea's first team squad list on official website, same for Rhys Taylor (Goalkeeper)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.