Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Adam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. the nominator has essentially withdrawn, stating in a comment, "Discussion closed with the conclusion of keeping the article." North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Adam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A basic search of Jacob Adam isn't finding any real sources to support notability. The person does not meet the notability requirements of a "creative professional" that would allow the article to remain on Wikipedia. MonroeHarless (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The corresponding page at German Wikipedia shows that he has been included in three print encyclopedias, which is a sign of notability - one of them was already in this article. (I'll add the other two sources to the article here in a minute.) --bonadea contributions talk 20:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That works. Thank you very much! Discussion closed with the conclusion of keeping the article.MonroeHarless (talk) 22:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.