Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacksons Creek (Delaware)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jacksons Creek (Delaware)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article concerns a minor creek with only trivial mentions, not significant coverages, from sources and should not be an article. This was previously a PROD article, but the tag was somehow deleted by the editor who created the article, hence an AfD is opened instead as the PROD could not be replaced. VickKiang (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Delaware. Shellwood (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete the link https://modelmywatershed.org/draw just shows that the creek exists. If that's all was required, then every creek would have an article. Plus, it would at least be better to make it link to the exact creek in quesiton, not just a general map. Same thing with the other link. The only link establishing some sort of credibility is the delewarepublic one, but its not strong enough for an article Rlink2 (talk) 00:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of significant coverage. –dlthewave ☎ 02:58, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Well, this is very interesting but, sadly, I really do think it breaches WP:NOTGUIDE. Not so much a lack of significant coverage as, frankly, not a significant subject. We have a brook near us and, while there is an article about our locality that mentions the brook, I would never expect to see an article about the brook itself. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not significant for creating an article for it. Foodie Soul (talk) 15:33, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.