Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Thorwegen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Thorwegen[edit]

Jack Thorwegen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article for non notable advertising executive. Part of a coordinated publicity campaign with the company and his colleague, nominated at the two adjacent afds. There's no point in merging, as even collectively there is no notability. All refs are either PR pr trivialities, . DGG ( talk ) 07:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:05, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I didn't find coverage for this fellow which would reach WP:BASIC. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article about the company he founded was recently deleted. That company appears to be what he's most notable for, so if his company isn't notable enough he isn't either. Elassint Hi 08:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.