The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 00:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Word for word copy of his entry already included in Li'l AbnerDarkAudit 19:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, we don't need the same information in two places. Useight 19:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as content fork. Ford MF 09:43, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Useight. Konczewski 03:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
