Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Meakin (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Meakin (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. One local newspaper article does not provide enough evidence of notability. Fails WP:NACTOR. Tassedethe (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 00:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 00:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and this is easy to see with no better improvement available. Pinging Wbm1058. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I see that we have two marginally notable people sharing the same name who are in competition for WP:primary topic. See:
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive271 § Help please (April 2015)
- Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 50 § What to do with "Jack Meakin (actor)" article? (September 2015)
I will work on untangling the edit histories and disambiguation, though I'm not keen on this diversion of my time from more important encyclopedic topics. – Wbm1058 (talk) 12:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Jack Meakin is now a dab, and I've restored the previously deleted history and the declined AFC submission. What's changed since then, to make this person more notable? Wbm1058 (talk) 14:15, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly does not meet WP:NACTOR, and searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.