Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Lucien's Forthcoming Album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Lucien's Forthcoming Album[edit]

Classic case of "X artist is going to release an album X". In this case, it's 4 months ahead of time. The only sources are YouTube, a MySpace blog and a link to iTunes. The link to iTunes could be considered alright except that it's a link to a single released in January without any indication that it's going to be on any new album much less this particular one. It's just too early. Once there's a release date or solid sourcing, it can be revisited but it's too early. User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 05:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hammeriffic album; we have no deadline and can definitely wait for a title on this. Nate • (chatter) 08:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No title? No verifiable links? Then here comes the hammer. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — I tagged this with {{Db-album}} shortly after it was created, but it was declined for procedural reasons … pure WP:CRYSTAL … Happy Editing! — 141.156.165.77 (talk · contribs) _{17:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)}[reply]
- Comment — Despite the Keep decision of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Lucien (2008-11-08), the subject's main article consists of nothing but WP:LINKSPAM and broken/bogus links … it is pure vanispamcruftisement ("Lucien believes in aliens. However, they don't believe in him.") and it probably would not survive another AfD. — 141.156.165.77 (talk) 23:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and smite with the hammer. MuZemike 04:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: another job for the WP:HAMMER; nom and Nate said it all. Cliff smith ^talk 17:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yes this page should probably wait until the album is released. Maybe somebody should stop the graffitying on his wikipedia page. All information correct but there are some people obviously hacking, how do you block people Deobook (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)DeobookDeobook (talk) 22:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: album information been published on myspace^[1]. Should be kept. Graffying should be stopped Thaliafan (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)ThaliafanThaliafan (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - MySpace is not considered a reliable source since it is a self-published source. — 141.156.165.77 (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

^ [1]

[1] [1]

[1]