Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabal ad Daya'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Michig (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jabal ad Daya'[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V, GNG, GEOLAND. Pin points to a farm & mosque on the Rugaylat road near Khor Fakkan in Sharjah. Also the below, all of which are part of the same series of stubs. BEFORE on all shows no result beyond WP generated cruft. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not verifiable. Reliability of reference is questionable, considering its poor track record in the other "Jabal" AfDs. — Newslinger talk 08:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:08, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. SportingFlyer talk 11:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At this point I don't know why I'm wasting time actually looking at these when all the other similar articles are hoaxes. Natureium (talk) 02:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They're not "hoaxes," just badly captured data from the pre-internet world. SportingFlyer talk 02:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I must say, "badly captured data from the pre-internet world" is a very elegant summation SportingFlyer! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, they fail WP:V. If somebody wants to recreate them sourced, no problem, but trying to salvage these mass creations based on old and dubious information by John Carter is a time sink. Sam Sailor 09:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.