Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron (2007 film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. It seems reliable sources have been found which establishes notability for the article. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 01:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron (2007 film)[edit]
- Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron (2007 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence that this film has been released or meets future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources can be found to show that filming has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 23:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? IMDb gives a release date of December 28, 2007, though in fairness, their other details of the film seem a bit sketchy. I've looked on google but couldn't find much in the way of decent sources, though this was complicated somewhat by the existance of the earlier film of the same name. PC78 (talk) 23:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above. It is a released film per HERE. Nom's concern has been addressed. Schmidt (talk) 01:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - See Radio Sargam article. Though I must add, that this movie hardly did anything at the box office. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 11:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Sean Whitton / 13:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It looks like it has already been released. I can find at least two articles about it or including it on various websites after a Google search:
[1], [2]. Not exactly extensive coverage, but it has been noticed. Black-Velvet 14:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Ned Scott 06:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.