Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Grime

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

J Grime[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced claims, only link is promotional. Looks like self promotion by Krisreeder10 also editing K.T. Reeder Go On Then - Kris T Reeder and Utopian Dream none pass WP:GNG KylieTastic (talk) 10:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I had similarly come to the same conclusion while stumbling across this user's edits elsewhere. The account's main purpose seems to be to force non-notable, WP:COI articles about themselves through the WP:AFC process. I've voiced concerns on their talk page, though they have refused to discuss or acknowledge the concerns. Regardless, I don't see any evidence of this meeting the WP:GNG. There's also very little content present other than a promotional attempt to create a neologism - through the "creation" of a new music genre. Sergecross73 msg me 16:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC as well as WP:NOTPROMO. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete I was impressed that the only source present was Amazon. It's coyly promotional but not meeting WP:GNG Dloh cierekim 20:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.