Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JTA Supermarkets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep: looks to be withdrawn by nominator but not properly closed, and no support for deletion (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 16:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JTA Supermarkets[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Article was created by company employee. No verifiable sources found to establish notability for encyclopedic inclusion of this business. Megtetg34 (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)~~ Per the constructive and fair feedback of editors. Withdraw Megtetg34 (talk) 00:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Despite assertions that there aren't sources, the article itself contains several sources, and did so when it was nominated for deletion. There's some issues with the quality of the writing (mostly WP:TONE), and additional sources and expansion/cleanup would be a good idea, but the subject of the article seems to pass WP:GNG easily. --Jayron 32 18:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Thanks for your comment. For clarification: Source 1 is from the company's own website. Source 2, 5 and 10 are from the same website. Per Wikipedia policy that counts as 1 source. Source 3, 8, 9 and 11 are from the same website. Per Wikipedia policy that counts as 1 source. Source 6 is dead/not existent. Source 7 isn't about the company, it is about an employee assisting a disabled man, lacking WP:ORGDEPTH. Megtetg34 (talk) 20:22, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The solution to a poorly referenced article about a notable business is to improve the referencing and rewrite the article. Deletion is not the answer. Quite easily, I found this article with four paragraphs about the history of the company. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Ok, thanks Cullen³²⁸. Megtetg34 (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.