Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JP Licks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
JP Licks[edit]
- JP Licks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete -- along with J.P. Licks (redirect) -- as promotionalism (G11). [email protected] (talk) 15:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Restaurant articles are problematic, since they frequently can muster press reviews as "evidence" of notability and almost always devolve into self-promotion. I favor a high bar here. This seems to be a local chain of ice cream parlors with no significant regional, let alone national, presence. The purpose of the article in practice is more or less a directory of shops. Therefore, this article should be removed. Carrite (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.