Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JHR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JHR[edit]

not notable. never heard of this term Sleepyhead 15:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete essentially meaningless TLA. All the article says is that it has "some enhanced contextual value" (what?) over other acronym. But without prejudice to making a new page on something more notable also using this TLA. Kavadi carrier 15:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article doesn't explain much, and I agree that it is not notable. - JNighthawk 16:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia shouldn't have an article about the acronym per se. Maybe it should have an article about the concept that the acronym stands for, but this article doesn't adequately explain what that concept is. --Metropolitan90 17:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

bread loses