Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JFLex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 01:38, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JFLex[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't find evidence of notability for this tool. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up some brief mentions on blogs and computer science department pages, but no significant RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 09:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete: After a search on the internet, I've come to the same conclusion as Dialectric. There are a lot of tutorials and forums and the like, but unfortunately there's nothing like media coverage. Orthogonal1 (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources are unreliable, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFTWARE. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:55, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.