Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JDTV (Johor Darul Takzim F.C.)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. GB fan 16:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JDTV (Johor Darul Takzim F.C.)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable online only tv channel covering one football club. No indication of WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. JDTV exists but that's about it. There is no evidence of independent coverage to indicate notability. Gm545 (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete MUTV or Chelsea TV this isn't; it's not even on par with a cable access station. Average video portal on site of average football team. Nate • (chatter) 10:38, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete Thanks for drop by and comment. JDTV (Johor Darul Takzim F.C.) is a web-based TV that operated by Malaysia Super League club; Johor Darul Takzim F.C.. It is still new so they wont put in the cable-access station but they will someday because the club has transform into profesional club in this 2 years. so i hope you will not delete it. somehow i am sure someone will expand the articles. Tq bro. MeenEunos10 (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2014

Comment - Nobody is doubting that the web channel exists, the problem is that there is no indication that it has received any coverage in significant reliable sources as required by WP:GNG. The fact that they may or may not turn it into a proper broadcast telvevision channel does not make it notable now as per WP:CRYSTAL. What you need to provide are sources that show that the TV channel itself has received coverage in other media, simply because it is connected to a notable club does not make it notable in itself. Fenix down (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no notability at all. Giant Snowman 13:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough independent coverage. However, a redirect to the club's article is also an option. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.