Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JBT
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus, default action is keep. Babajobu 13:18, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
JBT[edit]
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Hbackman 06:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Kinu 06:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 07:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of political epithets. AnonMoos 07:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Perhaps it should be redone as an article under Jack Booted Thugs discussing the increasing militarization of law enforcment and disregard of civil rights. --O.F.Fascist 09:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Prodego talk 15:10, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing more than a dicdef,
delete. Average Earthman 15:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Changing it back to form the original redirect seems appropriate to me. Keep as redirect to Jervis Bay Territory. Average Earthman 12:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The Jervis Bay Territory is a significant concept in Australian politics. The acronym is noted on the Australian government website discussing the territory [1]. The redirect has been in place since June, 2004 it was replaced by an obsucre definition in January, 2005 and then sent to AfD a month later. Cedars 01:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. --Siva1979Talk to me 09:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.