Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JABBER: The Jabberwocky Engine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Lourdes 08:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JABBER: The Jabberwocky Engine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable trivial program with barebone sources. –eggofreason^talk 00:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 00:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 02:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. One of the cited sources, CIAC's Electronic Magazine, appears to fit the parameters of WP:GNG, but since the others are either not independent (the author's profile) or not reliable (dead links to what appear to be university syllabuses), and since GNG suggests "multiple sources are generally expected", this article falls short. Cnilep (talk) 05:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.