Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J8ded (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" is disregarded for advancing no argument. Sandstein 17:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J8ded[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:WEBCRIT. Source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as [1], [2]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:26, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence whatever of notability. No independent sources cited at all, and little of value found on searching. (The previous discussion was closed by a non-administrator as "no consensus", but it was close to a consensus to delete, with the only editor arguing for "keep" using such weak arguments as number of Google hits, and citing very minor coverage, amounting to passing mentions, which did little to suggest notability.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. CouplandForever (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CouplandForever, the administrator closing this discussion should completely disregard someone who just says "keep" without giving any reason. A deletion discussion is not a vote: see WP:NOREASON. If you think there are good reasons for keeping the article, you need to say what those reasons are, so that they can be taken into consideration. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- per WP:PROMO; an advertorial page and largely unreferenced. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.