Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. J. Outlaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J. J. Outlaw[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never played a game in the NFL, fails WP:ATHLETE Delete Ibluffsocall (talk) 22:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not notable in his own right, and NFL Europe is not included among the leagues whose players have automatic notability of WP:ATHLETE guideline for particular leagues in American and Canadian football. I think that a good argument could be made that the quality of play in NFL Europe was on the same level of both the Arena Football League and the Canadian Football League. The idea that the Arena league was ever a "top-level professional league" is moronic... Mandsford 16:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it stands now. He may be notable for his college career, but I don't see it in the article. If someone takes the time to research it and it looks good I'd change my position. Having a cool name doesn't make one notable. Darn.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.