Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.CO Donuts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus -Djsasso (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J.CO Donuts[edit]

There is no verifiability and notability established. The article has been in existence for quite some time, and has not been improved.

Moreover - the article does read like spam. Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 08:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very very weak keep - The article isn't cited, but that isn't a reason for deletion. WP:CORP states that if the subject is covered by reliable, secondary sources, they qualify under the criterion. [1] and [2] could be considered secondary sources, and they are both certainly reliable. It does claim that they are comparable to Krispy Kreme, and as far as spam, I don't think it really was intended as spam, nor does it read so. Jd027^chat 16:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.