Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Hype

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

J-Hype[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:MUSIC. No sourcing found; current sources are only passing mentions. Prod removed by author without comment. Charting on iTunes is not an assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:41, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Wikipedia guidelines are respected, including secondary sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikifan115 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 8 July 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

What part of "passing mentions" did you not understand? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fail WP:MUSIC, not enough coverage about the subject. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 21:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable artist. Koala15 (talk) 04:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.