Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J-Flo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as G11 Jclemens (talk) 18:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

J-Flo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with only primary sources. Don't see outside notability nor sufficient indications even in the article. Lots of primary sources. Shadowjams (talk) 09:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MUSIC. Could also be speedy deleted for being a blatant advertisement. Actual quote: "This new Cd is one that you must add to your Cd collection" Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I would have speedy tagged this as spam. Absolutely no attempt at establishing outside notability. --Quartermaster (talk) 15:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - POV-drenched non-notability. "God has also used J-Flo to bring hundreds back to Christ by influencing young people to renounce their live of sin and purse Christ." .......awwww, that's not notable, they've been pursing Christ for generations now... Carrite (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per g11 at WP:CSD, "pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic." Having read the article, I very much believe that this article qualifies under both points. John Carter (talk) 18:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.