Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jørgen Pedersen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jørgen Pedersen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the references appear to relate to the subject - though they are all in German, and I might be wrong. Rathfelder (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The first reference on the current article clearly references him and his theory on the first paragraph. The primary reference for his work from 1952 strongly appears to be this: http://www.eje-online.org/content/9/4/342.short, which needs to be added with proper formatting and maybe a permanent link (I'm not sure about this one). The incomplete citation is no reason to purge the article. Fbergo (talk) 11:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 13:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 13:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Fbergo's 'keep' comment above does not directly address the subject satisfying the WP:PROF requirements. I did not have time to do a careful search but my initial impression is that the subject probably does pass WP:PROF. GScholar [1] shows at least one highly cited paper, with 907 hits, from 1977, which is quite good for pre-internet era. The the Diabetic Pregnancy Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes has an annual award lecture called The Joergen Pedersen Lecture, see [2]. The link also contains some biographical info about Pedersen and about his work. I added that ref to the article. Nsk92 (talk) 11:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That is quite enough for me to withdraw the suggestion that we should delete it. Rathfelder (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.