Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Izzat (honour)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Izzat (honour)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Izzat (honour)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The citations included in the article use the word izzat only to tell the word for 'honour' in indian languages.Is this article really needed when one for 'honour' already exists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by भारत्पराक्रमि (talk • contribs) 14:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh, Pakistan, and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
• Keep the article describes a culturally specific concept and is well sourced and coherent. Mccapra (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Keep. This article discusses honour specifically in a South Asian context so it is notable in its own right. There are far too many bytes in this article to merge to the Honour article. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 22:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep- This article discusses "honor" which is a culture of North India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. EngrShakamal (talk) 14:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

• Keep - Sourced, coherent, informative. There is nothing here to warrant a deletion at all. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.