Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivy Sports Symposium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ivy Sports Symposium[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than a couple of blog posts (the most notable being a piece on Business Insider that reads like a press release), I don't see any third party coverage of this event. I don't think it's notable. If it is kept, it needs to be rewritten from scratch, as every other like is overly promotional and pecocky. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found a press release: reuters.com Oct 13, 2010. A mention in Forbes January 16, 2012 and in New York Post September 2, 2012. Not enough to meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 04:42, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is providing information about a completely legitimate event. I don't understand what the problem is here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamespino (talk • contribs) 19:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spinning Spark 13:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:GNG. Simply existing is not the same as notable. LibStar (talk) 05:59, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.