Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Pereira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Meatsgains (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Pereira[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly structured WP:TNT Meatsgains (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Bishops are notable, and the first sentence of this is fine. Some others could be salvaged too, probably. Delete few sentences, format, but nothing warranting TNT. It's just your average crappy stub. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:57, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per piotrus' reason. This nomination is a misuse of the WP:TNT clause. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 05:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but the state of the article leaves a lot to be desired. Where's that article tidier that pops around from time to time when we need him? Karl Twist (talk) 09:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.