Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Kingsley Bitch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's Kingsley Bitch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously speedy deleted under the article name King Russell, which is now a redirect to this article. Rationale here: Not notable. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable internet personality Sasquatch t|c 00:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Would this be a possible candidate to be speedied because of its previous deletion? Andrew³²⁷ 01:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd be a candidate regardless of a previous incarnation. Drmies (talk)
  - But not a candidate solely because it was previously a CSD candidate. We only "delete because it was previously deleted" if the previous was an AFD, which is why I brought it here, knowing it will get recreated. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 12:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just as insignificant/nonnotable as when I speedied it; I'd speedy it again, but AfD's good too. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 02:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete under G11 and A7^{(- individual -)}. Technical 13 (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non notable person. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Non notable. Postoak (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:22, 27 April 2013

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.