Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israelite Church of GOD in Jesus Christ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. This article fails notability and verification, and there is already a entry on Black Hebrew Israelites about this church. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 00:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Israelite Church of GOD in Jesus Christ[edit]
- Israelite Church of GOD in Jesus Christ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There is no evidence of any notability for this group. The article lacks sources, is poorly written, and is not sourcable, as no reliable sources (except from their own website, which is a primary source) exist, as far as I am able to tell. Yahel Guhan 04:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not notable. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 06:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the current version of this article is a great deal shorter than those existing at the end of last October. It thus looks as if it has been subject to vandalism - but I am not sure. I have no comment on its merit, and it is unsourced, but it should be judged on the basis of its fullest version, not its current one. Peterkingiron (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - violates notability, soapbox or advocacy, reliable sources, verifiability, and advertisement. Bearian (talk) 13:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Poorly written, for sure. However, here is the link that I found on [religioustolerance.org. THe black Hebrew movement, although a fringe group within CHristianity, is quite notable. This article is about a verifiable denomination (not local congregation). It has been my experience (althought concensus can change) that denominations are inherently notable. Pastordavid (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- the black hebrews are notable, but this particular fringe group, is not. I don't agree that denominations are inherently notable. It depends on whether there are sources about the group that exist. And this source doesn't seem to provide much on this particular group. Yahel Guhan 01:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.