Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli Army diet (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli Army diet[edit]

Israeli Army diet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references currently in this article do nothing to support any claim of notability for this fad diet. The article refers to it as a "classic" fad diet popular in the 1970s, predating the internet era, so online references may be difficult to find. A Google search turns up many references in very low quality, spammy diet sites which fail WP:RS and don't help with verifiability; hits I can find in more reliable sources tend to be passing mentions and not primarily about the diet itself. The prior AFD from 2005 brings absolutely nothing to the table in terms of either notability or verifiability. I'm open to the possibility that this was notable and popular decades ago, but at his point I conclude that it was a brief, non-notable (in the Wikipedia sense) fad that doesn't meet notability criteria. Deli nk (talk) 18:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 03:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Covered fleetingly in some unreliable sources but no significant coverage in RS that I could find. Alexbrn (talk) 06:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per Alexbrn. This is pop-culture coverage at best, and trivial made-up BS at worst. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.