Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isogenous series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isogenous series[edit]

Isogenous series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't seem to be a term that's widely used enough to warrant an article. "Isogenous" by itself turns up quite a bit in contexts not related to spectroscopy, but I can't find any references other than the one in the article for the term as defined here. PianoDan (talk) 23:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, there is little hope of this ever becoming more than a WP:DICTDEF. The spectroscopy sources that use it offer no real additional analysis. SailingInABathTub (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 08:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does not appear to be a standard term in established use. It's probably a COI, too, since it was created in 2005 by Drtjstone and the first author on the only reference is T. J. Stone. XOR'easter (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I wasn't able to find anything else on this in the realm of spectroscopy. I haven't heard of this term before either. I agree with the above this is most likely a case of COI and someone wanting to bring this into more common use via wiki, which isn't the way to do things. --Tautomers(T C) 00:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOT#DICT. Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.