Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam Tarek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Modussiccandi (talk) 09:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Islam Tarek[edit]

Islam Tarek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks sigcov Ficaia (talk) 05:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would be more supportive of redirect if he were a one-club man. Redirecting to Tanta would give undue weight to that club over the other 3 that he played for before. Once he leaves Tanta, he will also cease to be listed at Tanta's Wikipedia article so, if the redirect remained at that stage, it may cause confusion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's a perfectly valid point, though the other clubs he seemingly played for have no (known?) stats and he has been at the current club for a healthy 6 years. I was more thinking along the lines of preserving the history and that any meaningful coverage (perhaps those listed below by CT55555) is likely to be in relation to Tanta. However as noted, I would not be against delete either unless verified reliable sources are determined. Bungle (talkcontribs) 14:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I didn't add it in as I don't feel skilled to assess Egyptian reliable sources, but these sources suggest notability:
  1. https://www.youm7.com/story/2021/7/5/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%88%D9%86%D8%A9-%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B6-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B6%D8%A7-%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A5%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B3-%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%85%D9%89-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%82/5379669 (story about the club not wanting to sell him this summer. It's secondary, it's in depth, I just don't know about the quality of the site)
  2. https://www.cairo24.com/1431526 (analysis the same as above)
  3. https://elbaladtv.net/%d8%a5%d8%b3%d9%84%d8%a7%d9%85-%d8%b7%d8%a7%d8%b1%d9%82-%d9%87%d9%83%d9%85%d9%84-%d9%85%d8%b9-%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%af%d9%8a-%d8%b7%d9%86%d8%b7%d8%a7-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%88%d9%83%d8%a9/ (same analysis of source) CT55555 (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - at least 57 appearances (per Soccerway) in the Egyptian Premier League, and sources are out there as shown above by CT55555. Nominator has clearly not even bothered looking as required by WP:BEFORE. GiantSnowman 11:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Soccerway doesn't even record matches before 2019. Over 100 EPL matches; international caps to. There's coverage out there linked above that appears to meet GNG. A completely dreadful nomination. I really don't know what User:Alvaldi is supporting here. Nfitz (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - A number of appearanced per Soccerway in the Egyptian Premier League, as GiantSnowman mentioned, sources are out there as shown above by CT55555 and this nominator seems to have a big problem with not doing any WP:BEFORE and appears to be just keen to delete football articles.— NZFC(talk)(cont) 06:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.