Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isla Nublar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Although notability is usually not inherited, this is clearly an important part of the franchise. GlassCobra 09:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isla Nublar[edit]

This article is an in-universe plot repetition of plot points from the various Jurassic Park stories, and has no notability or referencing of its own, and as such its just total duplication. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jurassic Park. Plausible search term. --Dhartung | Talk 06:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there are no primary sources to verify the origin of this article, which fails WP:NOT#PLOT. Merger would be inadvised, as without primary sources, this would be moving this problem elsewhere.--Gavin Collins (talk) 22:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it is the setting of a major novel, film, comic, and video game and can easily be verified by a multitude of sources. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 02:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this island was the setting of multiple different works of fiction by multiple different authors and in multiple different media. The Jurassic Park franchise is of undisputable notability and this is a major part of that setting. Bryan Derksen (talk) 07:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The notability of the whole franchise does not give this small part of it notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. -- Hiding T 18:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in accordance with policy, style and guidance for the reasons made above by Bryan Derksen. Hiding T 16:34, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.