Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isihara Satomi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Satomi Ishihara. Mailer Diablo 09:25, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isihara Satomi[edit]

First of all, her name should be Satomi Ishihara or Ishihara Satomi in Japanese, not Isihara Satomi. The spelling is wrong. The page for Satomi Ishihara already exists and Ishihara Satomi also redirects to Satomi Ishihara. Also the user categorized the page as Japanese porn stars, which is totally wrong and insulting since she is a popular Japanese idol drama (dorama) actress and has a very clean reputation! The link to that category has already been removed by me before it misleads others. Imperfect information 08:04, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like an argument to make it into another redirect, not to delete. If your allegations above are correct, it's a plausible misspelling (plausible defined as "somebody's obviously already done it once"). As for the concern about the categorization, I'd say sofixit but you already have. Either way, that's not an argument for deletion. (By the way, as a regular article page, this should have gone through the Articles for Deletion process, not Miscellany.) Rossami (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to AFD now. Tito xd^{(?!? - help us)} 23:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, it's an alternate spelling, not a misspelling. Kappa 18:48, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, as per Kappa. --Kusunose 07:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, per Kusunose and Kappa. Neier 08:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Satomi Ishihara, which has the same info and is far better. --C S (Talk) 13:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Kusunose 07:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.