Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isidar Mithrim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Eragon. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Isidar Mithrim[edit]

Very minor part of the plot of Eragon. All encyclopedic information has been given in less than a line of text at Eragon. There is not enough encyclopedic content to justify an article to itself. Una Laguna^Talk 20:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable plot element which has certainly not received substantial coverage from outside sources. There is certainly no reason for such a minor item to have its own article, especially when that article is entirely plot summary. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I've spent the last 20 minutes trying to find a place to merge what little encyclopedic data there is here, without success. --AnnaFrance (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect certainly not an article, but no reason not to have a redirect. DGG (talk) 21:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Perfectly valid search term, useful as a redirect.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Valid search term, would be better off as a redirect. Razor flame 18:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.