Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ishiyama-ryū

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ishiyama-ryū[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial art - basically a school with a couple of locations (based on website) and a few pretentions. References are essentially primary or about the founder and those are not enough to confer notability. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant independent coverage of this martial art. Main links are about the founder, but there's not enough there to show notability either. Halls of fame and school websites are not enough.Jakejr (talk) 21:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better than one link at Books and the usual various links at browser, the article is better than most other ones, but it could be better and there's simply no better sourcing. Feel free to draft and userfy, SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.