Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irvin Rivera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Irvin Rivera[edit]

Irvin Rivera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for Non notable photographer. Has a bunch of awards but none are major. Has a bunch of exhibitions but none are major. Small galleries, pay for play and the like. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is bombarded with multiple sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage of the individual. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 04:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 04:01, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 02:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE, seems self-promotional, and should be deleted. Qono (talk) 23:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.