Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron-Awe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iron-Awe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Robot Wars contestant. So far only UK champion (Roadblock, Panic Attack, Chaos 2, Razer, Tornado & Typhoon 2) and world champion (Razer & Storm 2) robots are considered notable enough to have articles. Hypno-Disc is only non-champion robot to have article, but this is due to it being a very famous Robot Wars robot despite oits failure to win a title. (Basically, it's a special case). Iron-Awe, however, is NOT a special case and is just not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:12, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lacks sufficient coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. I found this article. But that's pertty much it. That's not enough to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.